facts and values: bridging the chasm

That child is drowning. You should help her.

When you’re not wearing your philosophy pants, you might find the second sentence of this coolly-stated argument to flow naturally from the first. But when you’re forced to abide by the laws of logic, you may suddenly find the procession from the one to the other impossible. The difficulty is that the first sentence expresses a descriptive fact about the way the world is, while the second expresses a value, a prescription of what one ought to do, that appears to make no necessary reference to the fact.

The conceptual gap between these two kinds of statements is made explicit by the brilliant 18th century Scottish philosopher David Hume. In the Treatise of Human Nature, Hume observes that philosophers ‘proceed for some time in the ordinary way of reasoning’ with regard to observations concerning human affairs, ‘when of a sudden, I am surprised to find that instead of the usual copulations of is and is not, I meet with no proposition that is not connected with an ought, or an ought not. As this ought or ought not expresses some new relation or affirmation ‘tis necessary that it be observed and explained; and at the same time a reason should be given for what seems altogether inconceivable, how this new relation can be a deduction from others which are entirely different from it’ (Bk 1, Pt 1, §1).

I don’t wish to disagree with Hume that values are not logically entailed by facts about the world, and that the two are conceptually distinct. And this is, as far as I understand, all that he meant to uphold. But there is a more radical construal of the fact/value dichotomy, sometimes left unarticulated but pervasive in popular thought, according to which fact and value come apart in reality; the two are not only conceptually but are fundamentally distinct. I think this misunderstanding arises from and is reinforced by the abstract cases that make it difficult to see that facts come packaged with values.

It is true that in the case of deductive reasoning, which makes use of propositions abstracted from concrete states of affairs, facts and values are employed in a way that makes them seem wholly independent from one another. But it seems this way not because facts are in reality devoid of value. What is easily overlooked is that somebody selected that fact, among infinitely many others, as worthy of attending to. When the descriptive fact, “that child is drowning”, is declared by a concerned onlooker, it is selected among so many possible alternative facts (e.g. “the water is warm” and “that is a nice bathing suit”). It is chosen because the concerned onlooker considers it more worthy than these other relatively unimportant facts. And when I choose to use “That child is drowning” as an example of a descriptive fact, I am selecting it in favor of other possible examples because I consider it a better way to illustrate the concept of a descriptive fact. That is the value from which the fact is borne out.

The motives that guide a selection among facts, though they’re sometimes suggested by the context, are seldom suggested by the bare fact. They can be especially well hidden when the facts are at a second or third remove from a concrete state of affairs, like in the case of scientific claims or the premises of an argument. But that the presence of value in fact is disguised or dimly perceived is an epistemological difficulty, and to conclude from that difficulty that facts and values are two fundamentally different species, completely independent and never interacting, is a mistake. In reality, facts and values are co-instantiated, and to separate them is to rip reality in two.

Advertisements

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

6 responses to “facts and values: bridging the chasm

  1. Joe Petrone

    Bravo!!! I can only wish that more laws and lawyers were guided by this line of thought…..and the rest of us, too!!!!

  2. David Buchanan

    Well said and, I think, quite right. I wrote a similar piece last summer for the Partially Examined Life blog. Guess I’d be preaching to the choir but just In case you’re interested: http://www.partiallyexaminedlife.com/2012/08/18/nietzsche-pragmatism-and-the-fact-value-distinction/

    • TheMostLikelyStory

      Thanks Dave, but the choir has a lot to learn, apparently- I picked up a bunch from your entry. Keep me posted the next time you submit to the PEL (or anywhere for that matter)!

  3. I like your post. I think it’s true from a subjective point of view. That is, your value system influences how you interpret facts in the same way my value system influences how I interpret facts. But what if our value systems are dissimilar? Or what if we have the same value system, but different situations in which to exercise those values? I think this is a very ancient dilemma. If reality is ripped in two, what or who is doing the ripping?

  4. TheMostLikelyStory

    Norm,
    This is indeed a very ancient dilemma, and I think figuring out exactly what a value system is will depend crucially on the “location” (for lack of a better word) of the values. One thing that I find myself wondering over is to what degree we bring the values to an external world of facts (and the values would be subjective to the degree that we do), and to what degree we instead come to recognize objective values that are already out there, somehow intertwined with the facts. That latter phrasing implies that the value system is at least not wholly subjective. While it seems awkward to suggest that a value is somehow “out there” irrespective of who or what it’s valuable to, it could be the case that the fact itself depends just as much on who’s around to evaluate it. In any case, the mystery remains…who or what does the ripping? I like that!

  5. Grace Gesualdi

    This is great! I don’t know about objectivity or subjectivity of values, but I agree that if we weren’t so afraid of treating facts as though they had value, we’d be much better off. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s